Many of the women had low levels of vitamin D at the time they were diagnosed with breast cancer; some 37.5% had levels classified as "deficient," and only 24% had levels that were "sufficient". Is this a random or relevant finding?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7643/d76436033e21dfeaff70eaec3c4f1704797ef0e8" alt=""
After a median follow-up of 11.6 years, it was found that compared with women who had normal levels of vitamin D at diagnosis, the women with vitamin D deficiency were 94% more likely to experience metastasis and 73% more likely to die.
It is surprising to find vitamin D deficiency is so common in women diagnosed with breast cancer and that very low vitamin D levels adversely affect patient outcome. Although the data show an association, it is impossible say it is causal until the results are replicated.
Source:
ASCO 2008 Annual Meeting
1 comment:
Although it is not suggested as a causal factor, should women be taking vitamin D supplements? Or just getting out more in the sunshine?
Post a Comment